Home About Us Disorders Glossary Links Contact Us Search
 

About Expanded Newborn Screening

How to Obtain Screening
For Parents
For Professionals

Information About Disorders

Financial, Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (FELSI)

NBS Educational Tools......
Introduction
Message Library
Graphics Library
Disorder Descriptions
Guidelines

Legal Disclaimer

Guidelines to Consider When Creating a Newborn Screening Brochure

How Should Information be Presented?

  • According to parents, the brochure's format should:
    • Be short, simple, and concise
    • Use questions as headings
    • Use bullets when answering questions

  • Parents would like the information in the brochure to:
    • Be descriptive, but easily understood
    • Include a single, general description of the screening disorders
    • Be minimal; more detail should be saved for brochures targeting families with abnormal results
    • Include the Newborn Screening Program's contact information for those wanting more details

What Should the Brochure Look Like?

  • Visually, parents would like the brochure to:
    • Be colorful (pastel colors were preferred)
    • Use real pictures instead of line drawings
    • Use pictures of people (pictures portraying newborns and caregivers were preferred)
    • Use pictures that are ethnically ambiguous (e.g.: the picture's focus is on hands or feet rather than faces)
    • Use pictures that demonstrate a loving interaction between the newborn and caregiver

What Should the Brochure Avoid?

  • Parents have told us to avoid:
    • Using pictures depicting the heelstick process; this was viewed as "scary" or "threatening"
    • Using the word "disease" (the words "condition" and "disorder" are preferred)
    • Using the word "heelstick," many parents did not understand this word, or confused it with other tests using heelsticks
    • Using the word "metabolic" too often; this word was confusing to less educated parents
    • Describing each disorder included in a screening panel; this was viewed as overwhelming
    • Including too much information; parents who wanted more information indicated that they would contact the Newborn Screening Program
    • Including unnecessary information (e.g.: list of states participating in the regional newborn screening program)

  • State programs may want to include a list of the disorders screened by their program. This list should be placed at the end of the brochure.

Where Can I Get Other Ideas?

  • Our Message Library and Graphics Library contain key statements and graphics that:
    • Have been approved by participating parents and our project Steering Committee
    • Are not copyrighted
    • Can be included or adapted to fit within your brochure
  • You can also refer to link to the resources below for more ideas on formatting educational materials
    • Clear and Simple: Developing Effective Print Materials for Low-Literate Readers. National Cancer Institute. http://www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/oc/clear-and-simple
    • Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills, 2nd Edition. L B Lippincott Company. 1996.
    • Gaston N, Daniels P. Guidelines: Writing for Adults with Limited Reading Skills. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Information. http://www.cyfernet.org/research/writeadult.html
    • Lorig K. Patient Education, A Practical Approach. 3rd Edition. SAGE Publications. 2000.
    • Zimmerman M, Newton N, Frumin L, Wittet S. Developing Health and Family Planning Print Materials for Low-Literate Audiences: A Guide. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH). 1989. http://www.path.org/files/DC_Low_Literacy_Guide.pdf

Who Developed These Guidelines?

  • The Libraries were created by the Screening, Technology, and Research in Genetics (STAR-G) Project.
  • The STAR-G Project is a multi-state project working to improve information about newborn screening and genetic testing.
  • The project is supported by a grant from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, Health Resources and Service Administration Genetic Services Branch, MCH Project #:1 H46 MC 00189-03.

How Were the Guidelines Developed?

  • These Guidelines were developed using information from parents
  • Parent input was collected through:
    • 3 focus groups in Alaska
    • 3 focus groups in California
    • 12 focus groups in Hawaii
    • 3 focus groups in Oregon
    • 4 focus groups in Washington
    • 1,413 completed surveys in California
    • 633 completed surveys in Hawaii
  • Parents were of varying ethnic, educational, and socio-economic backgrounds

Where Can I Get More Information?

 

Legal Disclaimer/Funded by HRSA/MCHB
Contact: info@newbornscreening.info

Last updated: 07/28/2005